Doxis Blog  Customer Stories

Is your data ready for Agentic AI? Lessons from the Doxis Summit 2026

| Hanae El Bouchebti

Promotional graphic for episode 08 of The Enterprise Content Show on Agentic AI.

 

Agentic AI comes up in just about every roadmap conversation right now, but far fewer teams can say with any confidence whether their organization is actually ready for it.

And that gap is bigger than it looks.

According to Gartner (2025), organizations will abandon 60% of AI projects that aren't supported by AI-ready data through 2026. It's usually the data underneath a project that gives way long before the technology does.

Episode 8 of The Enterprise Content Show took that gap on directly.

Recorded live on stage at Doxis Summit 2026 in Munich, hosts Will McInnes and Franziska Thomas sat down with Roland Gruijthuijsen, Head of Enterprise Content Management at logistics automation company TGW Logistics, and Dr. Steen Dupont, IT Programme Manager at the Natural History Museum in London.

The two organizations could hardly be less alike, and yet they've arrived at much the same lessons about what agentic AI readiness really asks of you.

Key takeaways

  • Not every agent is worth building, because the ones that save five minutes rarely justify the effort while the ones that save an hour start to earn their place
  • AI can fix messy data itself, turning cleanup into an outcome instead of a starting condition
  • Trust in agentic AI comes from guardrails and visibility
  • Change management decides whether an AI initiative sticks
  • Incremental steps outperform big transformation leaps

What is agentic AI readiness?

Agentic AI readiness describes the state your data, systems and governance structures need to be in before you can deploy AI agents that reason and act with a meaningful degree of autonomy.

Data quality is one piece of it, since agents need reliable information to work from.

Governance is another, because it keeps an agent inside boundaries you've set in advance. And none of it lands without change management, because the people affected by an agent's output have to trust it enough to use what it gives them.

An organization can have serious AI ambitions and still be a long way from ready if it's missing any one of those.

The real test for an agentic AI use case

Dr. Steen Dupont was blunt about where the bar sits for a useful agent.

Agents that handle five-minute pieces of work are token-heavy relative to what they save, while agents that save half an hour to an hour are starting to be worth the effort.

That framing cuts through a lot of the noise around agentic AI, because not every repetitive task needs an autonomous agent sitting behind it.

Roland Gruijthuijsen made a related point from the TGW Logistics side, which is that you have to work out what the benefit of the whole process actually is before you introduce AI into it. Drop AI into a process you haven't understood and you'll rarely get a result worth measuring.

If you're working out where to start, it comes down to two questions.

How much time does this task cost you today, and is that cost concentrated enough for an agent to meaningfully reduce it?

Fix the data before you fix the output

No agent gives you useful output when it's sitting on top of records nobody trusts, so the information foundation still has to come first.

What the Natural History Museum shows is that AI can help you build that foundation faster.

With more than 80 million specimens and 25 million-plus metadata records already digitized as part of its RECODE collections management program, the Museum has no shortage of duplicate and inconsistent records built up over more than a century of collecting.

Steen's team is using AI to find and resolve those duplicates first, and then building everything else on top of the cleaner records.

That's still foundation work, only with a better tool doing the heavy lifting. The order doesn't change, because records have to be reliable before anything autonomous goes near them.

Where the volume of inconsistencies is far too large to work through by hand, AI can shorten the cleanup rather than excuse you from it, as long as the effort is scoped and governed properly.

Trust depends on guardrails you can see

Autonomy is what defines an AI agent, and it's also the reason enterprise teams hesitate to put one into production.

What changes that calculation, Steen said, is a set of guardrails and clearly defined skills, backed by a security layer around what an agent is allowed to see and do.

Roland made much the same point from a different angle.

When IT spots a potential AI opportunity, the process owners who'll live with the outcome need to be in that conversation from the start, because they're the ones accountable for it once it goes live.

Visibility is what turns cautious oversight into confidence. Once a team can see exactly what an agent did and why it reached a given decision, permission to widen its scope tends to follow.

Change management decides what actually sticks

Both guests landed in the same place by the end, which is that the technology is rarely the hardest part of any of this.

Roland called change management one of the most important parts of any transformation, and Steen took the thought further.

Organizations can't do large transformations in a single leap, so change has to happen in smaller, deliberate increments. Change itself never stops, after all.

For an enterprise like TGW Logistics, which coordinates project documentation and CAD drawings across branch offices on three continents, that incremental approach is what makes scaling AI practical in the first place.

How Doxis helps you build agentic AI readiness

The readiness themes from Episode 8 map closely onto what an enterprise content platform has to deliver before agentic AI can be trusted with real work.

Doxis's Intelligent Content Automation platform is built to close that gap.

AI-powered document processing keeps metadata and records consistent, while built-in governance controls define exactly what any AI capability can see and act on inside your existing compliance framework.

That foundation goes well beyond a single feature.

The same platform brings together enterprise content management, business process management and purchase-to-pay automation, so agentic AI capabilities are governed by the same permissions and audit trail as the rest of your content as they roll out.

Doxis's AI Studio and Agent Manager, both previewed at Doxis Summit 2026, extend that governance model to agent permissions, which lets administrators define what each agent can see and do before it goes live.

With Doxis, you gain:

  • AI-powered classification and metadata extraction that improves data consistency at the source
  • Centralized governance controls that define AI and agent permissions across your entire content estate
  • A unified platform combining ECM, BPM and IDP, so agentic AI features inherit existing compliance and audit trails
  • Configurable, incremental rollout of AI capabilities, so you scale at a pace your teams can absorb
  • Full visibility into AI-driven decisions through paragraph-level grounding and traceable actions
  • Proven ROI, with manufacturing leader SEW-EURODRIVE achieving a 336% return on investment over a payback period of under six months, according to a Forrester Total Economic Impact study

Doxis is recognized as a Leader in the Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Document Management.

If your organization is evaluating where it stands on agentic AI readiness, request a free demo to see how Doxis handles data quality and governance today.

Automate Work. Accelerate Business.

Bring together AI, ECM, and workflow automation in one powerful enterprise platform.

Frequently asked questions

What is agentic AI?

Agentic AI refers to AI systems that operate with a degree of autonomy, so they make decisions and take action toward a goal rather than simply following a fixed set of rules.

How do I know if my data is ready for agentic AI?

Start by auditing data consistency and completeness in the specific process you want an agent to handle. Duplicate records, missing metadata, or outdated formats will limit what an agent can resolve reliably on its own.

Is it better to clean data before or after introducing AI?

Both approaches are valid. Some organizations use AI itself to identify and resolve data inconsistencies as part of the rollout, letting the dataset get cleaner as the project progresses.

What role does governance play in agentic AI adoption?

Governance defines what an agent can see, what it's allowed to act on and where a human still needs to approve a decision. Without that, autonomy quickly turns into a liability.

Why do AI initiatives fail even with strong technology?

Most AI initiatives stall on change management. Teams need to trust an agent's output before they stop double-checking its work, and that trust builds over months.

Should agentic AI be rolled out all at once or gradually?

Gradual, incremental rollout consistently outperforms a single large-scale deployment, since it allows teams to validate an agent's reliability on smaller tasks before expanding its scope.

Is agentic AI available in Doxis today?

Doxis offers AI-powered document processing and governance controls today. Specialized agentic assistants and the Agent Manager are on the Doxis roadmap, with a preview shown at Doxis Summit 2026.

What is the biggest blocker to agentic AI adoption?

Data quality is the most common blocker, followed closely by unclear governance and a lack of buy-in from the process owners who'll use the agent's output day to day.

You might also be interested in...

How can we help you?

+49 (0) 30 498582-0
What is the sum of 7 and 4?

Your message has reached us!

We appreciate your interest and will get back to you shortly.

Contact us

Table of contents